Oscar Wilde's paradoxical novel forms a fitting introduction.
In old English the word earnest was used to describe a pledge, secured through the interim transfer of property. It proved you were earnest in your intention of completing the agreed transaction or action.
I have no fitting pledge to give to prove I am in earnest when I make shocking claims. I make them only out of concern for my family. I don't mind people making fun of me, but I am saddened because it seems to underscore the lightness with which my earnest warnings are regarded.
The Bible based philosophy I have come to accept is in direct opposition to everything that comes from the world. I believe there is a perfect creator who created the world and mankind in perfection in an environment that is perfectly ordained and synchronized with his holy purpose. It follows that the way to remove all sickness, suffering, environmental destruction, war, and hatred is to return to following the biblically defined paths and the statutes and commandments of the Lord.
The alternate view is that the world proceeds on a chaotic course, and it is only through the diligent efforts of the brightest men and women that we can come to solve all of its problems. Unfortunately however, solutions are never more than partial and always produce great disagreement and struggle, and they are often anyway abandoned mid-stream to deal with a crisis, real or invented, so the progress all are praising never really seems to emerge, other than for a small number of individuals who live in the upper strata of society.
Technology can do much, but it produces just as many problems. The perfect economy of a simple lifestyle with only locally available technology, green roads, transport on foot, on horses, in carriages or on the sea, clean water, nutritious and natural foods, contact with nature, loving contact with our family and our community, joyous celebrations of the beauty of life cannot really be improved upon.
It is indeed an old book, but the Biblical promise is that it is everlasting and unchanging, and that every prophesy it contains will be fulfilled precisely precisely as stated.
Its track record in this latter respect has been perfect (although many intellectuals will attempt to deny this fact). There is no other book on the face of the earth that comes close to the Bible in terms of breadth of vision, accuracy of prophetic writings, accuracy of historical records, and indeed worldwide sales.
I have read the Bible carefully, and followed prophesy diligently. I have tested matters against reality and the truth of the Bible is confirmed time after time. There is a massive division occurring right about now, and the choice we make cannot be later undone. On the one side stands the kingdom of satan, ruler of the world, who entices with wealth and status but ultimately treats his subjects harshly and delights in their suffering, because he knows that we are all children of the Most High and greatly beloved in His sight. On the other, stands the emerging Reign of Christ, who will ascend to the throne very soon and rule in righteousness and honour. The Biblical teaching is that whosoever loves his life, shall lose it, and whosoever hateth his life shall inherit life eternal in the new heaven and the new earth.
I believe those things, and I believe you are both daughters of Israel, which is the Holy people chosen by the Lord. The one thing I would ask, is that you read the Bible: it really doesn't seem to me to be intellectually jusitifiable to live a life of literature and yet refuse to read what is most certainly the most widely read work in the entire world and has been so for many centuries, the oldest and most complete history known to man, renowned for the beauty and force of the prose or elsewhere the quiet simplicity of the language. A book that is designed to be accessible even to little children and yet can easily confound the greatest minds of the most learned men and women in the land.
Questa mattina lessi la storia di Gideon, che appare nei Giudici
Of course I know people don't heed what I say and I expect it in the main, unless I am paying them. I cannot, however, seem to find the authority that my wife and daughter could claim in order to proceed in such a manner.
Self-ownership is valid and it may be claimed, however tautological, but it disregards the family relations that bind us together so intimately through blood. This is not a light matter: we are all somewhat invested in one another. It is physiological, I have no need of Scripture to make such a claim.
So should we all heed what one another says?
Of course. Especially that which is stated in earnest. I think our familiarity would at least require us to take time to look into the matter, whatever it may be.
But it was the author's pleasure to toy with his readers and flaunt his cleverness, amusing and delighting, and giving them perhaps a little insight into the fickleness of the human heart. I suppose he was earnest in his desire to write well crafted books, for frivolity, royalties, and the general elevation of his public persona.
His life however was nothing more than play acting, since the man was a confederate of his judges and petty officers of the constabulary and thus at no risk other than the vertigo that may come from a rapid ascent to the highest levels of literary and even philosophical renown and relevance.
