Americans... our kin. another author

I want to speak about a land, upon which I never walked. A land over which the whole world sought. I sit by English cliffs, looking far across the ocean from Land’s End. And I touch the waters of the sea as an offering of love, which the watery ripples will send, for our people in America. They are filled with our blood; they are our family, who live amongst the strangers and stand where we should. It's easy to attack them for their rulers’ worldly role, but you cannot blame them for what they cannot control. What power has the farmer, the mechanic or the chef? What power has the housewife or the factory worker over any life or death? 

What power have these people, over the media forces of filth? What power have they over their political structures? Are we not also having our fill? They have as much power as you or I, and they live occupied by the same who wish us all to die. Your American kin is your brother. They are families, innocents, and we should love one another. 

Some say she is the great Satan, some say she is the source of all evil on Earth, and those who do, they do not care about you... they only seek to take their own turf. To take their prize; they seek their vengeance against us all, to inflict the harm they dream of in their eyes. Because America, she was no demon! She was a beauty in all the world's sight. And she was crafted by humble hands of our kin. She held good morals, great dreams of wonders, and held them tight. But she suffered great sickness, just as we have here: there is no difference between us all, and it is the sickness which brings the fear. 

I sit on the cliffs of Land’s End and blow a sweet kiss, as an offering of love to send to our family who live across the great open waters between. To let them know: we know too.

I don't know the name of the author of this text, which I transcribed , in or around 2021, from a video clip that I can no longer locate.

A loud voice

At church, a while ago (I no longer attend), a gentleman from the Punjab region of India came into the congregation one day. He arrived a bit late so we didn't know anything much other than that he was clearly of the Indian race and very heavy indeed, because he was very fat around his waist so it would be hard to sit down properly.
He had some other interesting things about him, as we found out later.

When we had our tea and biscuits he turned out to be a very talkative man. No one couldn't get a word in edgewise and once, when I wanted to interject in what seemed to be a lull, he turned to me and held up a strict and wagging finger to say he hadn't at all finished and would not be interrupted.
I thought it was rude, but afterwards he more than made up for it by giving me a tee-shirt saying I "heart" Jesus on the front. I did wear it out once or twice, but I am not much of a tee-shirt wearer so it's mainly pyjamas and no one can read the message, as I sleep alone.

He was a Sikh. It's unusual for his brethren to convert, but later I met some more Christians among them so perhaps it's not as rare as converted Muslims. Muslims have very strict societal codes, but Sikhs are more Western in their outlook and customs Many of them are fond of Britain's alehouses, like me, but I think their religion might prohibit alcohol. I'm sure it is a problem within their community, as it can be among my own brothers and sisters.
John Paul, he said, was his name, and we found it surprising at first but then he explained that he had changed it when he got converted.

I am never very happy about name changes like that, and my aversion started mainly with a young man I met in Italy who's accent was clearly from Newcastle or Manchester or some northern region of Britain - I forget precisely which one. He told me his name was Yash and I didn't buy it. He had been given it in an Ashram, since he was a follower of a certain Indian cult like several other people I met in Italy, all of whom had different names and some of whom insisted on using them. To me, it's irritating and disrespectful of one's parents,  family, community, and former friends.
There is only one who may change a name, and His name is YHWH, who called Abram "Abraham", Sarai "Sarah" and Isaac "Israel". He also changed Saul's name to "Paul" in the New Testament, to signal a change of heart that He had ordained. 

It was on the fellow's next visit that we discovered his loud voice. During the "quiet time", being a period when any of the men in the congregation can speak, on the condition that the speech is Biblical and proper, John Paul began to recite a prayer.

He started in a normal voice - deceptively soft at times - and then began to get louder and louder. 

His delivery was magnificent. He had very good recall of long passages of Scripture and he was skilled at knitting them together to create a complex and moving message that was really excellent, all things considered.

But he increased the volume stage by stage and kept on and on, with no lull or let-up. My ears were already crackling as they do sometimes, and I discreetly covered my most exposed ear with my fingers. And it got even louder until he was bellowing at the top of his voice. Someone said that he had noticed the windows were rattling and I think he was speaking sincerely. Someone else claimed the roof had slightly lifted at one point and we should probably check the tiles.

No one dared say anything. I did catch Sheila's eye at one point and I think her eyebrows were a bit higher than normal, as were mine.

Eventually, after the first few sessions, the preacher had a word with him and he quietened down a bit, but he still displayed a tendency to succumb... it seemed to get the better of him.

I used to wonder why he did it. He came with his wife and she seemed very nice. I think she was a Christian too but I don't know whether she was one on her own initiative or rather to agree with her husband. That would be perfectly fine I suppose, but not if the husband were a tyrant, because the things we are forced to learn are always wrong, wrongly understood, and wrongly conveyed, and will achieve the effect of resentment rather than knowledge. Whether he was a domestic tyrant or not I have no idea, but his voice could probably be classified as a weapon within certain acoustic parameters so he would have to be sure to use it with great discretion.

After a while I realised John Paul coveted the pulpit. He was auditioning. When another church in the area started to offer better prospects of getting to the front, he was off.

He might say that the name John Paul was a good opening, so he could start evangelizing without delay. 

That would be true  perhaps among his own people. The other Sikh Christians I met were mainly evangelizing their brethren. However, now  that I understand our Christian identity, I know the heathen nations are not appointed to evangelize Israel. Only Israel has been ordained and chosen by God to evangelize the other nations. Of course that doesn't mean we are not in need of evangelists: Israel languishes in a very sorry state indeed at the time of writing; but that state will not be improved by disregarding the clear instructions imparted by YHWH concerning our nation.

Re Giacomo vindicato?

Michele ha fatto riferimento in un video recente Il settimo anno, il compimento delle profezie all’omonimo inglese “sun/son” (sole/figlio) nelle interpretazioni bibliche. 

È vero che Eric Dubay e i suoi confederati del New Age amano queste informazioni perché, non credendo nella Bibbia, gli piace trovare delle spiegazioni esoteriche per i misteri e la potenza di Geova, ma il concetto apre anche un altro scenario, per me interessante.

Fra gli appassionati della KJV (la traduzione del 1611 fatto su ordine di Giacomo I di Inghilterra – Giacomo III di Scozia) ci sono sempre stati quelli più accaniti che avanzano l’idea, in apparenza improbabile, che il KJV è addirittura superiore ai testi ebrei e greci originali. 

I motivi dati per un simile convinzione sono come segue:

1. Il fatto che Dio ha benedetto la KJV per gli ultimi 400 anni, diffondendolo in tutto in mondo per evangelizzare i popoli (è il libro più venduto in assoluto nella storia)

2. Nelle Scritture la traduzione sotto guida divina è sempre migliorativa. I profeti traducono sogni e scritti ermetici per renderli chiari… per portarli alla luce.

“Per fede Enok fu trasferito in cielo perché non vedesse la morte, e non fu piú trovato perché Dio lo aveva trasferito; prima infatti di essere portato via, egli ricevette la testimonianza che era piaciuto a Dio.”

La parola “trasferito” è “translated” nella KJV –la traslazione come spostamento in una nuova dimensione, spirituale in questo caso.

In qualche modo il Nuovo Testamento altro non è che una traduzione del Vecchio ed è migliorativo: vino nuovo che richiede otri nuovi.

3. Non esistono più i testi originali, quindi che autorità possono avere?

4. Tutte le traduzioni Protestanti nelle varie lingue hanno dovuto far riferimento alla KJV per scegliere una linea di interpretazione, dato la diffusione e autorità percepita per l’opera

5. Le parole della dodicesima Salmo: 

“Le parole dell'Eterno sono parole pure, come argento raffinato in una fornace di terra, purificato sette volte.”

La KJV è la settima traduzione in ordine in inglese ed è quello che ebbe un successo inaspettato. Non era subito amato: gli americani usavano la Ginevra perché non volevano  associazioni con re Inglesi (tutt’ora la maggior parte degli americani pensano che il loro paese sia indipendente dalla Corona, ma chi di voi segue le vie della verità avrà forse avuto motivo di dubitarlo). Ciò nonostante, il testo si è difeso innumerevole volte contro attacchi determinati e continui da parte di intellettuali e teologi vari, ispirati, fra l’altro, dalle perfidie di Wescott e Hort e altri.

Personalmente lo considerò la parola di Dio, ma non esito ad indagare frasi e parole e le loro origini per capire meglio. La verità sembra a volte essere formato da tanti strati, che vengono rimosso pian piano da Geova quando siamo pronti

La KJV contiene un numero pari di parole, quindi non esiste una parola centrale, ma i versetti centrali si trovano in Salmo 103. 

Benedici, anima mia, l'Eterno, e tutto quello che è in me benedica il suo santo nome. Benedici, anima mia, l'Eterno e non dimenticare alcuno dei suoi benefici. 

Entrambi iniziano, in inglese, con “Bless the Lord, O my Soul”

Continuano con “benedica il suo santo nome”

e “non dimenticare alcuno dei suoi benefici”

Parole molto potenti per star al centro della Parola di Dio

Tornando all’inglese 

Bless the Lord, O my soul: and all that is within me, bless his holy name. 

Bless the Lord, O my soul, and forget not all his benefits

sono 28 parole: sette (numero divino) per quattro volte

Le parole centrali sono  

“bless his holy name”, con 12 parole precedente e 12 parole successive e, come il sette, il numero dodici ha un significato speciale nella Bibbia.

Ancora. Il primo versetto della Bibbia KJV

In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth

e l'ultimo versetto di Rivelazioni

The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all. Amen.

sono entrambi composti di 44 lettere, di cui 17 vocali e 27 consonanti
una simmetria perfetta
In quanto alle parole, Genesi 1:1 ne contiene 10, mentre Rivelazione 22:21 ne ha 12, totale 22. Questo numero punta al autore della nostra Bibbia come definito in 1 Giovanni 5:7, il versetto rimosso da praticamente tutte le Bibbie in uso nelle assemblee religiose principali - compreso la Nuova Riveduta - ma rimasto, per grazia di Dio, nel Diodati.  

For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.
(Poiché tre sono quelli che rendono testimonianza nel cielo: il Padre, la Parola e lo Spirito Santo; e questi tre sono uno.)

Nella KJV sono 22 parole.
10 significa le Nazioni (gentili), come elencati in Genesi 10
mentre 12 sta per Ebrei, da  Rivelazione 12

Poi apparve nel cielo un gran segno: una donna vestita di sole, con la luna sotto i suoi piedi e sul suo capo una corona di dodici stelle.

22 è il numero che sta ad indicare sia Ebrei che Gentili, da Salmo 119, composto di 22 strofe, con l'intero salmo generalmente considerato di mettere assieme Ebrei e Gentili in modo unico nella nostra Bibbia.
Lettere contenuto in 1 Giovanni 5:7 = 88 (il totale di Genesi 1.1 + Rivelazione 22.21)
Vocali contenuti in 1 Giovanni 5:7 = 34 (stesso totale di Genesi 1.1 + Rivelazione 22.21)

Genesi 1.1 è il fondamento della vera scienza, che parte della Creazione
1 Giovanni 5:7 rivela la struttura della Filosofia Divina, con la Parola o "Logos" in posizione centrale fra Padre e Spirito
Rivelazione 22:21 è la fine ultima della nostra fede: dimorare con la grazia di Gesù Cristo. 
Facendo le somme, emerge che Giovanni 5:7 (filosofia divina) viene formato dalla somma di Genesi 1:1 (scienza) e Rivelazione 22:21 (grazia)

Forse è vero quindi, come sembrerebbe suggerire il commento di Michele, che l’inglese abbia un significato particolare per il nostro Dio?

Non sono arrivato alle informazioni matematiche da solo, ma consultando il sito King James Bible Statistics e guardando il video The Mathematical Miracle of the King James Bible quindi i miei ringraziamenti e riconoscimenti vanno ai rispettivi autori, e soprattutto al Re dei Re per l'abbondanza della Sua grazia e pazienza.

An old writing

 The trouble with writing things on other people's blogs is that there is a time limit to the matter unless you are actually married with children, in which case some people will claim there is anyway a time limit but they are wrong, however many lawyers and liberally minded folks will tell them otherwise.

It's like attempting to relax in someone's living room when you simply can't stand the curtains and can't seem to get them out of your mind, until, that is, you remember the sofa, which is uncomfortable and slightly odorous and places you in a position within the room that is not that commanding place at the table you prefer to occupy in your own kitchen, but rather a lower place with less inviting views and greater distance from the hearth (in winter) or from a refreshing breeze from the patio doors on those occasional summer days we have in Birmingham.

Sooner or later you will have to bring the matter up, which is hardly polite and as unlikely to produce a positive outcome as nodding vigorously when your head is three inches from a brick wall.

So I decide instead to come back to Facebook, where I intend to write some absolute nonsense, in which case anyone who cares to disagree is forthwith invited to mention it in the kindly tones I always enjoy to hear, although unless you awaken me to a previously unknown thing you will not affect my outlook and my patience with actually reading the writings of anyone who disagrees with me is not exemplary, although I sometimes manage a couple of sentences at the beginning and end of the argument. Anyone who agrees, on the other hand, should do so in silence because I am an exceptionally vain man and any trace of praise can cause me to take rash and optimistic decisions - including the wearing of unusual headgear - based on a sudden and entirely unjustified ascent of sensations of immense self worth.

Anyway, that urbane living room - the one from which I took my recent departure - seems to have suffered very greatly from my absence. Of course this is what my immense vanity would lead me to expect, but I was actually quite shocked at an episode of strong words and underlining that had the unfortunate and inevitable effect of detracting attention from some very interesting points that would have benefited from more civil investigation. I have also noticed a tragic lack of humour and even of ideas themselves since I left, which is quite odd when the grand master of the order of freedomainradio (who was our foil) and his speakings and actings offer endless opportunities for hilarity and even for some serious reflection from time to time. If you are a person reading this who thinks that this particular great man is not a suitable subject of conversation, even though he is a public figure, then I hope you will forgive me for rejecting your argument and inviting you to refrain from reading that which offends you.

However, although this already far too popular (my opinion) fellow may get a mention from time to time, I have discovered far more interesting things to make fun of and far more surprisingly silly things in which to believe, so I will probably branch out a bit, although I will have to take care not to attract the attention of the Illuminati, since it is rumoured that it will soon become illegal to think or say anything extraordinary in Britain at all, unless one limits one's focus exclusively to tench fishing practiced strictly in accordance with the "catch and release" technique.

I also quite like to do some "creative writing" from time to time, but I promise to keep it short and display all the warning decals required by the Machinery Directive.

Finally, when I left that other blog I was surprised to learn that one of its members occasionally disagreed with me. This matter is quite surprising because I had always considered that person to be quite sensible in the main, unless she (I speak of a lady) thinks that Pluto was the planet visited during those great writings rather than the Moon. In this case, I will defer from protest, since it is a matter I have yet to establish with any degree of certainty. Anyway I hope she and other followers of that blog will join me here to add their comments from time to time (do you think they can find me?). I have enjoyed our conversations greatly over the past few years.

I hope all my old Facebook friends are hale and hearty, and if you think I could more profitably (not in the financial sense) write this sort of circular inanity elsewhere (I know what you're going to say here, but I mean where I can share it - I already have plenty a bits of paper in the house full of odd statements), please let me know.

The Witches and Warlocks

The scene opens high above a deserted town square in the daytime and then closes down to a tree with four benches, focusing on the protagonist, seated on one of them. This is apparently a provocatively dressed young woman but is actually a gender transitioned person with the clothes, makeup and hairstyle associated with those of a young woman. There is only one other figure in frame, an elderly gentleman seated on another bench facing away from the protagonist and apparently immersed in an illustrated book of some description. The distance is too great to discern the title or the nature of the image, but perhaps with higher resolution that would be possible. It may seem strange to say it, but the book in question is almost certain to be a magical emblem or token of some kind. The magic will be encoded in the title, the image, the writer, the main character, or some other aspect of the work. All shots contain this element. That's why "set dressing" is such an important craft. Hardly any viewers will be aware of this type of encoding. 

Because all movies and televised events, like all other media, are an expression of witchcraft, which casts the spells that are used by Satan and his hordes to control the whole world. Always from the shadows, because that is his way. Everything is opposite to the Biblical instructions of sincerity and plain speech.

The spell-casters are the actors, who are all witches and warlocks of varying degrees. This is why they are re-gendered. That is the base layer of deception. The viewer is drawn in, but is unaware of the force at play and can thus be manipulated. I think most or even all are re-gendered from birth, their parents and families are all co-conspirators to greater or lesser extents. Anyway, acting may also be viewed as an expression of narcissistic personality disorder, attracting narcissists who can be readily controlled by means of narcissistic supply, a commodity that is available in abundance in the theatre. I think actors are victims in the main. Many of them start their career as small children, often with actor parents.

Witchcraft is real. Magic also. If you watch YouTube videos on these subjects it becomes apparent that we are not dealing with sleight of hand, at the higher levels, but with actual magical phenomena. The magicians in Egypt recorded in the Bible, named Jannes and Jambres, copied the Lord's servant Moses and turned their rods into living snakes, turned the water of the Nile into blood, and brought a plague of frogs upon the land. But they were not able to copy the many subsequent miraculous acts, so we are taught that they are powerful, but God is far more powerful than they.

In the olden days we used to read the Bible here in England, and in much of northern Europe, because we brought it with us from our home in Israel and Samaria as we fled the persecution that had been brought upon our tribes due to our disobedience and hard-heartedness. 

To read and understand the Bible gives protection against witchcraft. We are taught the good way and to depart from path of wickedness. We are taught the danger and allure of sexual transgression. The danger and allure of hedonism. But men and women are easily enticed so we must simply rely on the Lord's guidance in all situations. I do not believe our Lord requires us to be chaste and doleful in worldly matters. We are born in sin and the old man and the old woman continue to live in us. It is not "wrong". It is natural and inevitable. Willful suppression is far more dangerous.... some measure of self denial when the ego attempts to assume control over the self and the spirit of God is dispersed.

I think the Lord will always lead when we allow it.  

Shadowland

A dark and shadowy wood concealed them, but Ariel entered nonetheless. 

It was early evening and the sun filtered through the leaves, although as the boughs knit together more closely above the broad path the gloominess became tangible, like an ominous presence surrounding him. 

He knew he must pass through the forest, however perilous the journey. He had abandoned his father's house at dawn after refusing for the last time to kneel to the family's gods. His sisters clung to their mother's skirts but he was to be taken on the morrow to the men of Baal for judgement, and Ariel knew it would go hard with him and his life was in pledge. So that evening, as he was cleaning the animal stalls, he decided to creep away before dawn and make haste to remove himself from danger. 

But his mother loved him and the Lord had compassion, so when he crept into the kitchen in the small hours he found victuals and a flagon of wine left out. So he took them, with sling, knife, flint and steel, and a single iron cookpot and spirited himself away from his home with a heavy heart, melting into the wan light of the new dawn.

He passed the open fields furtively as the sun arose, keeping to the hedgerows to avoid detection and making slow progress, so the hour was becoming late when he finally reached the edge of the wood, but he felt relief to be cloaked at last by the oaks and sycamores, the myrtle, the laurel and the juniper. It was too late now for the fellers, hunters and charcoal burners to be about their craft, and the wood was vast, stretching hundreds of miles to the north, east, and west. So he left the main path and found a hollow under the rock, where he made a soft bed of moss and lighted a small fire for warmth and to roast the venison he had taken from his mother's larder. 

Leaning back against the rock he peered into the thick darkness beyond the firelight. Creeping sounds and pattering feet were all around him. A branch snapped in the distance and he gathered up his staff and sling, mindful that this was the home to wolves, bears and dangerous creatures. His heart was heavy as he thought back through his life. The bright optimism of the college and his disdainful opposition to his teachers, men and women who,  in the main, seemed to lack understanding about even the most basic matters of life. It was a gay time indeed, but he was making a name and a reputation, eyes were upon him and the world was at the threshold. It was time to become a man, find gainful employment and take a wife, but he was in love with beauty and excitement and had no time for studies, debts, and worldly cares, lacking any degree of respect for his elders.

The meat crackled over the flames and he made a pot of roast garlic and wine to moisten it. The feast was fit for a king. The fat ran through his fingers and the succulent meat brought strength and vigour to his bones for the road ahead. He fell into a deep and restorative sleep in the shadow of a great oak beside the dying embers of the fire.

Things important, things senseless

"Flat earth" is a misnomer that came into use only as a reaction against the globulism that dominated the latter half of the 20th century and continues to prevail, although its days are numbered. I prefer to speak of "biblical cosmology", also because it's not really about flatness per se, but rather a series of characteristics described in the Bible, many of which  perceptible to our senses. 

We cannot, however, perceive the foundations of the earth, the gates of hell, or the windows of heaven. We can imagine the ends of the earth, but we cannot realistically visit them since they are extremely cold, remote, and highly protected militarily. The levelness and the stillness of the world, and the local nature of sun, moon, and stars are all perceptible to a greater or lesser extent. Even the firmament can be glimpsed when thunder and lightning are reflected from it to dramatic effect or in phenomena such as sun dogs.

In church, some of the more cautiously minded will surely be reluctant to dismiss the idea point blank, but they generally say that the matter is unimportant in the greater scheme of things, which is all about getting folks saved and spreading the Word.

This is to assert that truth has no bearing on salvation. But the Bible says that Jesus Christ is the truth, so to relegate truth to a secondary role is to detract from the holiness and integrity of our Lord and Saviour, the only one who can actually save anyone. 

It makes no sense.

Minor matters of worlds and authorities

Also because the subject is banned, so no information can be shared, it is my experience that regular church-going Christians simply do not grasp the central importance of the lies of modern big space cosmology in relation to our faith, our walk with the Lord, and our understanding of the literal truth of the Word of God and the reality of the Satanic system in which we live.

The spinning ball realm with its multiple 666s encoded in every single aspect of the mathematics used to make the claims (actually witchcraft) is Satan's kingdom, in which the beauty of God's precious work is obscured and our home is reduced to a "pale blue dot" of completely insignificant importance in the vast solar system and beyond. It also forms the bedrock for the lie of evolution and the lie of atheism, since the big bang singularity event  is its source. A big bang could never be posited as the source of the unique world fashioned by the hand of God, never moving and laid out beneath His Eternal Throne, standing indeed on pillars, as it is accurately (of course) described in our Bible.
This lie is the single philosophical keystone supporting the massive development of atheistic thinking in the modern world. Once removed, the whole sorry edifice must collapse. It is central to the issue of salvation.

The very heavens - the throne of the Almighty God, may his name be praised forever - are removed and replaced with a black void in which, we are told, elected men can float as though they were in water. To which men can ascend in rocket ships, even though the Bible clearly teaches that there is only one way to Heaven, which is through the Lord Jesus Christ. Big Space is the Tower of Babel, set up in defiance of the Lord and his anointed.

Careful scrutiny of the claims of modern astronomy, as of almost all other areas of science, cannot fail to reveal that those who have made them are mocking us and the Lord.

The minds of children are fractured by this Pythagorean paradigm at a tender age, because they must be taught to distrust their senses. Their perception, of course, is that of living on a motionless land of fields and mountains covered with a vast sky that contains sun and moon, of similar size and locally positioned in respect to the Earth. They must however be made to believe in the globes present in all schools and the space propaganda spewed from every screen and video game. We are actually spinning! Up is up for us, but the same direction would be down in Australia! we are held down by a magical force called gravity, otherwise we would all spin off into space! It is hard to grasp, but all the adults nod their heads wisely and so the child realises that his or her God-given senses are unreliable. A similar injury is inflicted when parents lie about the very wicked Santa Clause, whose very name spells Satan. Nasa shares the same characteristic, with the forked tongue vector through the letters doubling as the missing "t".

The world we are told to believe in by the high priesthood of science is sun centred, because the people who control it are sun worshippers and have been so since Babylonian times.

But the world described in our King James Bible is quite different. It is the Lord's realm, surmounted by the firmament in which he has set the sun and moon and the countless and beautiful stars, all for his glory and our wonder. And he sits above all upon his throne, so we all look up to heaven in precisely the same direction, whether we live in iceland or on the curiously named Deception Island in the South Shetlands. 
There are literally hundreds of verses in our Bible that confirm the true nature of the World and the Heavens.

To claim that to ignore them and continue to believe the Babylonian lie is a matter of little consequence is, frankly, ingenuous. And to claim, as some do, that the King James Bible teaches that we live in the spinning ball universe (in which the Earth spirals around the sun on an elliptical orbit at a speed of  66,616 miles per hour) is either a sophism or a lie. 

Of course, people may choose to refrain from looking into the matter and so remain on the fence about the nature of our world, but they must be very careful before then claiming to believe the literal truth of the Bible. Also, is this the Biblically recommended action, and is not the diligent search for truth generally endorsed and encouraged by Scripture?

I have often heard people say that it is more important to try to get as many people saved as possible and this issue is secondary at best.

Well, in Scripture, when things needed to get done the first step was always to ensure absolute submission to the will of God in all things. There must be no anger, unrest, strife, or wickedness in our heart and in our camp: we need to trust in Him fully. Is it a small thing that we have allowed the literal truth of the Lord's creation to be so hideously distorted by Satan within the heart of the very church? That in this matter we are not trusting the words of Scripture? And that a sincere believer is so glibly prevented from protesting and defending the literal truth of our Bible?

There is no church in the land in which this matter can be taught and discussed, whether Catholic or Protestant or other, even in a small "faithful" assembly like your own. I cannot speak as a member of the congregation any longer or I would be in breach of instructions received, so I am necessarily without the camp. I had no desire to depart, but after a few initial attempts to invite discussion and investigation I have fallen into line and remained silent for a long time. I have known this truth since before I first attended Hellier Street. That it is unknown and indeed unwelcome in that assembly and elsewhere is, I think, a very serious matter indeed. 

We need to remove the accursed thing from the camp before the people can be truly blessed by the Lord. And can it be doubted that tolerance or even endorsement of Babylonian sun worship is an accursed thing indeed?

Faithful submission to the Lord always produces fruit, especially when such submission brings with it condemnation from the world. Surely then, and only then, would we see many people blessed with salvation. Then the assembly would really catch on fire, and we would likely see a division in the churches with a departure of the lukewarm and false prophets, accompanied by a simultaneous and far more abundant influx of new believers from all backgrounds.

Motivi vari per non seguire procedure farmacologiche

Sheri Tenpenny spiega qualcosa dal punto di vista medico (comincia a circa 5 minuti).

Ci sono tanti medici che dicono cose simili (ho preso uno un po' a caso), ma sono messi a tacere in vari modi. A parte della semplice eliminazione molto celere di informazione dalle varie piattaforme online, viene usato la denigrazione di carattere, qualifica, intelligenza..., assieme all'affermazione che chi presente informazione che posso dissuadere la gente dal vaccinarsi è pericoloso e potenzialmente omicida.

Naturalmente un informazione contraria deve esistere, ma viene sempre messo nella bocca di persone controllate in qualche misura (es. i predicatori nelle chiese), quindi dobbiamo procedere con cautela. Di questa signora so nulla e faccio fatica a scoprirlo perché le solite fonti sono tutti inquinati. Mi pare sincera comunque e sono idee ormai abbastanza diffuse.

In termini pratici, stanno dicendo che chi prende il vaccino non sarà immune alla malattia, ma se la prende sarà probabilmente meno grave. Si deve ancora star lontani degli altri, non ti fa uscire da lockdown, non sarà comunque risolutivo in alcun modo. Ma il nocciolo della questione è che questo farmaco cambia il modo in cui l'organismo si comporta in risposta a minace potenziali da "virus", e questo cambiamento è irreversibile. Chi lo prende rimane legato per la vita alla casa farmaceutica, perché deve fare ogni richiamo puntualmente, il primo a circa 6 settimane, i seguenti annualmente e ogni volta che viene annunciato che si è sviluppato un nuovo ceppo del virus, per non ammalarsi, perché le difese "naturali" saranno alterati. È proprio come il software del PC: se non aggiorni il sistema pian piano fa sempre più fatica a funzionare in rete. Non a caso vediamo l'amico Bill Gates al centro del discorso, con brevetti a non finire. I pericolo sociali mi sembrano evidenti, ma si rispecchiano e aumentano al livello personale.

Questo non è la medicina per la pressione sanguina che dovresti prendere a vita ma magari dopo fa ginnastica o prendi minerali o adotti altre strategie di salute, o a puro tiramento decidi di smettere (anche per non dover sopportare le note effetti collaterali). Da qui, non si torna più indietro.

Per questo, diventa come un "marchio", come viene descritto nella Bibbia due mille anni fa. Figurativamente, che prende il farmaco si mette la fiducia nella "scienza" per sempre. In molti sono d'accordo di farlo, ma non ricordano o non sanno che la scienza è

• variabile a secondo le varie scoperte o riscoperte con il passare del tempo
• del tutto deviato in tanti campi, anche a causa del poter corruttiva del dio denaro ma fondamentalmente per una ragione filosofica e spirituale.

Il mondo sta cambiando. Il sistema mondiale è ancora (ma non per molto) orientata intorno al sole, fisicamente - con l'eliocentrismo - e filosoficamente, perché il sole viene celebrato come fonte della vita.

Succede nel contempo un gran risveglio e aumento del scrutinio e scetticismo in tutto il mondo, grazie al potere di internet ma anche, e soprattutto, alle rivelazioni divine. Il Signore diceva al profeta Daniele: 

Or tu, Daniele, serra queste parole, e suggella questo libro, infino al tempo della fine; allora molti andranno attorno, e la conoscenza sarà accresciuta.

Sta per ritornare il Signore, non c'è alcun dubbio. E siamo in molti a pensare che succederà durante la nostra vita.

In quei giorni e anche ora, gli occhi di molti saranno aperti a causa delle parole e gli atti dei fedeli (i "testimoni" nella Bibbia, che vengono martirati) e cominceranno a credere, quindi salvandosi davvero. Chi invece ha temuto per la propria vita nel mondo di oggi e si è affidato al sistema scientifico (che è sotto tutt'altro dominio) per difendersi, sarà escluso irrimediabilmente della vita eterna nel nuovo mondo di giustizia e bene che ci sarà sotto il regno del Re Eterno Gesù Cristo, anche se vorrebbe accedere, e non potrà neanche venire per salutare i famigliari, nel caso ci sia qualcuno..

Opporsi al farmaco per motivi medici (di cui ci sono tanti e validi) è una posizione debole perché non siamo dottori ne tantomeno virologhi quindi per ogni paura oo protesta, ci sarà qualcuno che possa placcare con informazioni contrastanti, ma opporsi per motivi spirituali - per non vivere da schiavo è più semplice e difensibile. La libertà è troppo prezioso per darla in pegno al OMS o l'USL per i pochi anni che ci rimangono.